Back dating invoices speed dating waterloo university

The commonwealth-trained (and more prudent) approach would be to insert the date only when the last party has signed and to use a date no earler than the date of that last signature.

back dating invoices-64

This is reflected in the Linklaters article Execution of Documents: Five Common Questions Answered, which offers the following advice for in-house lawyers: “(i) contracts may only be backdated, absent fraud, in circumstances where an original form has been lost or where terms have been fully agreed but signatures have been left to a later date and (ii) deeds may never be backdated.” Unfortunately, the article offers scant authority, and a search on Google reveals little else on the subject from the commonwealth world.

In the US, however, there seems to be have been much more consideration of the issue (at least according to my Google search results).

Despite recent controversies surrounding the backdating of executive stock options, the general attitude in the US is that backdating is not wrong (or right), per se.

Such relation back or forward contravenes no principle of law and is determined by the intent of the parties as deduced from the instrument itself.” As a practical matter, the proper date to put on an agreement is something that corporate counsel is likely to have to make a judgment call on quite often.

This is because documents take time to draft, negotiate and execute.

It would not be uncommon for there to be a lapse of days or even weeks between the time commercial terms are agreed and the date of final contract execution.

Even for a simple document such as a Non-Disclosure Agreement (or Confidentiality Agreement), the parties may legitimately want the document to take effect from an earlier date.

In this article, the author writes: “Backdating by itself is not generally, at least with respect to private agreements, illegal.

Rather, it is the use of the backdated documents by the parties or their counsel that may violate the law.” The US approach seems to be founded on the principle that parties to an agreement (or deed) are free to agree that the document is to take effect prior to the date of execution – this is often denoted by dating the document “as of” the earlier date. Bradley Real Estate Trust, the US Court of Appeals (7th Cir.

Comments are closed.